Asian dating websites that are scams - what that
Screenshot of Michael Michaelson profile as seen by ladiesFurther on, I present a single piece of persuasive evidence from the results of this fake profile that the scamming on asiandate.com is systemic. If you want to go straight to that evidence, then please click here. Otherwise, read on for the build-up to that evidence.
The implausible chat pop-ups
Within minutes, the chat pop-ups began appearing. They never stopped, only increasing in frequency over the following few days. The vast majority of the "women" (I quote that word only because it is entirely possible that behind any of these messages was a man) messaging "Michael" sported profile pictures that looked professionally photographed, and most of the ladies could even have passed for professional models - in all likelihood, many if not most of these images were of professional models. A sample of some of the first few messages "Michael" received, along with my commentary, if any, in grey, follows. I did not take screenshots of any of these chat pop-ups, but you don't have to take them on faith - you can perform the same experiment that I did, and see for yourself that these are the sort of messages that you receive.
- 23 year old Li:
hello,may i have a chat with you
Chatting with "Li" would have cost "Michael" one credit per minute after the first three - I wonder what it would have cost her? Based on reviews I've read by past customers, it's very likely that "Li" was a paid employee of asiandate.com. - 20 year old Binghan:
Michael,So sweet to see you here .
This is a lovely greeting, but why would it be sweet for "Binghan" to see "Michael" here when all she knows about him is that he's a seventy year old man who wants to hear only from scammers? - 19 year old Rui:
what make such a man open his door for me?
As for "Binghan" above, why would "Rui" want such a man as a seventy year old in search of scammers to open his door for her? - 45 year old Xianhong:
Do you like a sweet and passionate Chinese girl? [followed by images of roses] - 31 year old Lisha:
Do you like a sweet and passionate Chinese girl? - 22 year old Wenwen:
I am such a passionate sweet lady,you will love to being stay with me forever?Michael
Three "sweet" and "passionate" women message "Michael" one after another - are they reading from the same script? - 27 year old Fei:
i live in your country now ,can i visit you ? [followed by emoticons]
It's suspicious that "Fei" uses the phrase "your country" rather than naming that country, I doubt she even knows which country it is, let alone that she lives in it. - 26 year old Hongmin:
oh , so tired now. want to lie on the bed, then close my eyes. would you like to join me honey??
Doesn't this seem more than a little forward for a genuine woman sincerely searching for a life partner? - 24 year old Huijun:
i am wealthy, do you like to have a wealthy wife?I can be a good wife.I am serious.I am for real.I want have you. Can you be mine?
How likely is it that a wealthy and attractive 24 year old woman would proposition a 70 year old man whose image she had not seen and about whom she knows effectively nothing except that he wants to hear only from scammers, versus the likelihood that...? How likely, too, is it that if she were legitimate, she would send the exact same message a second time not long afterwards (she did)? - 20 year old Yiling:
i live in your city ,can i visit you ? [followed by a bunch of emoticons]
"Yiling" implies that she knows in which city "Michael" lives without him even having mentioned it anywhere, and, tellingly, she does not name that city.
After several days, the chat pop-ups stopped arriving from asiandate.com women and started arriving (almost, but not quite) exclusively from anastasiadate.com women (more on this site and others in the family later), as evidenced by both the physical appearances of the women and the chat links, which were to pages in the anastasiadate.com domain. For some reason, the women started addressing their messages to "Not" rather than to "Michael", presumably because I had previously registered an account "Not Real", although I'm not sure how that account/name became linked to the "Michael Michaelson" account. In any case, the frequency of the pop-ups didn't abate - if anything, it increased. There were pretty much constantly at least one and often around five chat pop-up windows on the screen at a time.
The "questionable" letters
Within 24 hours, the letters began accumulating in "Michael's" asiandate.com inbox. Again, most of the women in the photographs looked like professional models. Many of the letter writers purported to have read "Michael's" profile, in which he solicited messages from scammers only - yet here they were messaging him anyway. Whilst this is strong evidence of fishy business, I've got an even better actual smoking gun to present afterwards, so read on for that. Here is a sample of those quotes from those letters, including any of my comments in grey.
- 25 year old Yu feng:
"Wow, I consider myself the luckiest girl in this world today! I appreciate every word in your profile and you must be the very man that I’ve been searching for years!" Screenshot of Yu feng's first letter - 24 year old Que:
"I can’t believe my eyes as soon as I see your profile here. You are such a gentle, easy-going, kind-hearted, nice-looking, responsible gentleman. I have a very great first expression for you and wish to know more things about you." Screenshot of Que's first letter
I'm not quite sure what "Que" was looking at because "Michael" didn't post any pictures. - 26 year old Mingfeng:
"I have already studied your profile and I can't deny that I'm impressed." Screenshot of Mingfeng's first letter - 31 year old xing:
"Since you get this letter, it means I read your profile and have crush on you." Screenshot of xing's first letter - 26 year old Yu:
"Your profile attracts me deeply. I am really interested in you. I hope I can have a chance know you better, can I?" Screenshot of Yu's first letter - 25 year old Yan:
"Before I send my letter to you,I read your profile carefully , to be honest , I am deeply impressed on you,." Screenshot of Yan's first letter - 32 year old Xinxia:
"I am so happy that I clicked on your profile today, you are so attracted to me with your sincere words. " Screenshot of Xinxia's first letter - 28 year old Sunnie(Jinxin):
"I’ve read your profile, I feel that you are sincere, kind, gentle and loving." Screenshot of Sunnie(Jinxin)'s first letter - 23 year old Songmin:
"I can’t help wanting know more about you when I reading your profile. You seem to be the right man I am waiting for. I can’t miss a man as good as you.
I am very glad to meet you here as I have a strong feeling that you are the right person for me. Can you believe it? It is hard to explain." Screenshot of Songmin's first letter - 36 year old Yi:
"When I first saw your profile, I know that’s the chance for me." Screenshot of Yi's first letter - 34 year old Ying:
"I have a good feeling for you when I read your profile" Screenshot of Ying's first letter - 27 year old xia(Angie):
"I have just read your profile, till now, your shadow still in my mind. You are so attractive for me so i have to take the initiative to contact you." Screenshot of xia(Angie)'s first letter - 24 year old Manirat (Ann):
"I was looking through the profiles here and saw yours, and wanted to say hello." Screenshot of Manirat(Ann)'s first letter
Out of the first 23 letters that I opened, 13 (about 57%) of them, as quoted above, explicitly asserted that the writer had read "Michael's" profile and was interested in him based upon that profile, and three others (about 13%) implied it by writing such things as "I’m very interested in you [...] I believe the first sight , perhaps the first look can doom our fate", "you can't imagine how happy I am at the moment" and "I feel so happy to be here to coonect with you my dear". So, about 70% of the first 23 letters I opened either by a charitable interpretation blatantly or implicitly lied, and/or, by a more likely interpretation, attempted to scam "Michael" by flattering him and pretending interest only so that he would spend money (between $4 and $8 a pop) to read and reply to future letters. That's not to say that the remaining 30% were not scammers, and, indeed, the style of their letters was very similar.
Too, several of these letters (the very first contact these supposed women had had with "Michael's" profile) included such implausibly forward statements as "Do you want to regard me as your special princess in your heart forever?", "honey,I want to have a castle with you,just you and me,will you want to be my prince?" and "I think we can create a new future by us". Those just don't ring true to me as the type of thing a genuine woman seeking lasting love would say to a seventy year old man she'd never met before, especially absent a photograph or any other identifying details.
I also can't fail to mention that after the first photograph in each letter, it costs ten credits to open each photograph, and that, surprise, surprise, many (around 50%) of the letters "Michael" received contained more than one photograph.
To give you an idea of the frequency of the letters, around 60 letters arrived within the first nine days - about 6.5 letters per day.
Non-consensual profile editing: the "out" that's still "in"?
The only real "out" I can see from the evidence in the previous letters section of systemic lying by female supposed clients of asiandate.com does not reflect well on this site anyway: it is that the ladies on the site are genuine but that the profile of Michael Michaelson that was presented to them was not the profile I entered, but an enhanced and fluffed-up profile, with a customised image. A reader of this page once wrote to me to let me know that he had evidence that asiandate.com does sometimes edit men's profiles without the consent or even knowledge of those men.
Whilst this might occur to some extent, I doubt that it occurs to the extent that would be necessary to excuse the otherwise disingenuous claims of the letters presented above: the reader who wrote to me did not allude to or provide evidence of anything that dramatic. Even if it did, though, would you be willing to pay money to a dating website which manipulates your profile without your consent or even knowledge?
Replicating the results
To check that this wasn't some strange anomaly, on 5 July 2014 I created another fake account, "John Smith", aged 88 (the maximum age it is possible to set for men on asiandate.com), with profile description ("A Few Words About Yourself") set to "I am an old and decrepit man with terminal cancer and absolutely no money. I will die within a month, the doctors say.". As with "Michael"'s account, I provided no photographs. Within two days, the account received 15 letters, with similar results as for "Michael" - many of the writers claimed to have read, and to be attracted to "John" based on, his profile; many of them provided more than one photograph. Chat pop-ups for "John" didn't start as immediately as for "Michael", but once they did (after about a day), they were similarly incessant, and equally implausible.
Systemic scamming: the smoking gun
All of the above points strongly to scamming - that deceptive letters are sent out without regard for any particular qualities of their recipients (other than having money to spend). It is even strongly suggestive of systemic scamming - that these letters are sent out by the asiandate.com system itself rather than by personal agents. Today (14 July 2014), I came upon the smoking gun that all but proves that this is the case: the second line of a letter from "Shanshan(Joan)" contained a typo which reveals that, apparently, variables such as can be set in these letters, strong evidence that these letters are actually generated by a script which replaces variables with values and then automatically sends the letters out. Below is a screenshot of the letter in question, in which I have circled the smoking gun in red.
-first-letter-marked-up-face-blurred.jpg)
Please take a moment to consider the implications of this. In all likelihood, the "personal" letters by "women" writing to you with such admiration for you and your carefully constructed profile are in fact generic form letters sent out by the asiandate.com system itself to many, many other men as well as to yourself. And if you respond? Who knows how that works? Presumably, your letter is assigned to a paid member of the asiandate.com team, who, with the help of software, with minimal effort crafts a passably "personal" response to your letter, which you pay between $4 and $8 to read, and another between $4 and $8 to respond to. Presumably, your response is again assigned to a paid member of the asiandate.com team, not necessarily the same member as last time - so long as you're paying and they're getting paid, it doesn't really matter who fields it - etcetera, etcetera, until you finally tire of spending money to no end.
Corroboration
This section, an update added on 22 September 2015, provides a couple of corroborations of the systemic scamming on asiandate.com. The first is indirect, providing plausibility only: it demonstrates that at least one other online dating agency definitively engages in the defrauding of its users through automated messaging too. The demonstration is contained within the fascinating article that I came across a few days ago, the title of which speaks for itself: How Ashley Madison Hid Its Fembot Con From Users and Investigators.
The second is more direct corroboration. A month or so back (it has taken me a while to update this page), a reader kindly contacted me to let me know that he had received by email from asiandate.com several letters from supposedly different women which all contained exactly the same wording. He shared with me images as proof, and he invited me to add them and his story to this page, and so I'm doing that. Note that the messages begin slightly differently, but that after that they are identical, including the misspelling, "divoiced", the typos in which the fullstops after "today" and "relax" are not followed by a space, and the fact that "relax.it" is a hyperlink. I have bolded these identical parts. Note that the reader did not pay to open these messages, so all we have are these summaries. The only adjustment I have made to the images has been to resize them, and to censor a link which would have allowed access to the reader's asiandate.com account.
| Sender | Age | Date received | Message | Images (wording in #3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lijun | 45 | 10 July 2015 | Honey Bruce Pretty kind lovely with except for one friend tell me that she get divoiced today.and she feels so relax.it is like... | Lijun 123 |
| Hui | 35 | 10 July 2015 | Honey Bruce Thin better on account of sick though one friend tell me that she get divoiced today.and she feels so relax.it is like... | Hui 123 |
| Quinggui(Xenia) | 20 | 15 July 2015 | Dear Bruce Better beside kind long inside one friend tell me that she get divoiced today.and she feels so relax.it is like take off... | Quinggui 123 |
Agency women?
Consider this: when you select the "Woman Seeking a Man" option at registration on the asiandate.com home page, you are redirected to the registration page of a different site, globalcompanions.com. Once you register as a woman on that site, your login does not work on asiandate.com, and vice versa. There is, then, no way for women from the general online public to register an account with asiandate.com. From where, then, do the female profiles on asiandate.com originate? The official answer (in one of the shonkiest videos you will ever see - don't be taken in by this dissembling) seems to be that they come from thousands of affiliated dating agencies.
Judging by their photographs, some (about 10%) of the women in the contact letters don't seem quite so much to be models as do the rest, and given this, it's possible that indeed some "real" agency women are used (as opposed to fake profiles, using photographs of professional models, created by agents of asiandate.com itself). Nevertheless, their introductory letters are very likely also being sent automatically by script, so even in the case where a woman might well have registered with an agency and be "real", you're very likely not actually being contacted personally by her.
More than likely, you will never actually get to talk with her, but rather will speak with a paid agent of asiandate.com itself pretending to be her. There are on the web multiple negative reviews of asiandate.com, such as this one on www.scambook.com, which assert that this (that one only gets to speak with paid employees of the site), indeed, is exactly what happens, and whilst I have no way of verifying the authenticity of such reviews, they are consistent with my research above.
Update: A reader's feedback and advice
This section was added on 18 December 2015, based on an email that I received not long ago from a reader of this page. This reader is a member of asiandate.com, and writes that about a month previously he had started asking big questions about its authenticity. His experiences with the site - receiving 100 to 200 letters per day with the vast majority from women outside his preferred age range; having his complaints about this fobbed off; chat sessions with the senders of the letters being ice cold; etc - had led him to suspect that it is a scam site, and he writes that this page confirmed his suspicions. He also writes though that he has been in contact with genuine women through the site, including via webcam, which turns the "possibility" that I raised in the previous section into a reality.
He also adds the following advice which he feels is very important and needs to be added to this page. It is based on his having done business and lived in China before, speaking some Mandarin, having had a Chinese wife and thus "[knowing] the lay of the land and cultural twists and turns better than most". His advice is to always ask to see an ID card. This is how he came to the conclusion that the women he was talking to via webcam were genuine. He writes that Chinese people never proceed with a contact without first getting a scanned copy of that contact's ID, and that members of asiandate.com ought to adopt this practice too.
Show/hide Robert's full emailHi Ive just finished reading your critical review of this scam site/s and I have to agree with what you say.. I have been patiently using this site and about 1month ago I started asking very big questions about its authenticity.. I get anywhere from 100 to 200 letters PER DAY (truly) 99.99% from 18 to 29 well outside my preferred age group 35 to 48, when I complained of the spam I was simply fobbed off .. it never stopped Most of the letters I would recieve were clearly fake and nothing more than income generation ie daily letters all 1 paragraph long that were very generic that didnt acknowledge me personally etc etc. I would start a chat session with 1 of these so called girls and it would always be ICE COLD, no warmth whatsoever and I was cut off when I suggested 1 long letter per week and that I would NOT open any letters unless it was 1 per week. Hence my finding your review... thanks for confirming my suspicions.. Just today I recieved 10 letters from 10 different 20something girls that all started "Hello Terry".... My name is Robert. Further confirmation that this is mostly a scambot... However I have been in direct contact with a couple of real ladies on webcam recently >40 and having done business and lived in China before and speaking enough Mandarin to get into trouble I KNOW to always ask to see the girls ID CARD ... (I also have a ex Chinese wife so I know the lay of the land and the cultural twists and turns better than most) GOLDEN RULE 1 thru to 10 ... You can NEVER proceed with any Chinese contact without 1st getting a scanned copy of who you are dealing with..this is what Chinese ask of other Chinese ALWAYS... I would recommend you add this critical info to your page somewhere... Im still confident however that a couple of +40 ladys Im chatting with are quite real as Ive thrown the tester in there and pleaded poverty and that I am not in any hurry to find my lady etc etc and I cant respond to their letters until I get money.. youll quickly confirm from their behaviour over a month if theyre in it for real or not.. Also -- on ASIANDATE.COM I was recently contacted by a 39yr lady who I had also been in contact with (many letters) on CHNLOVE.COM before moving to ASIANDATE.. this lady didnt know who I was at all..... go figure.. I left CHNLOVE as I got really pissed of with this particular lady who refused to accept my CALLHER request (100% ignored) and her letters were consistently generic and never including my info. Again though not all ladys on these sites are all fake as I did have several successful meetings in China (I was living in Shenzhen) with real women.. (CHNLOVE.COM) however these encounters never proceeded to anything of substance but the ladys were 100% real and what their profiles said they were... SO this is proof that at a minimum some are true fakes on these sites but equally some are quite real.... Lastly I complained directly to ASIANDATE Admin and made it clear that I was only interested in meeting financially secure Chinese ladys (as per my profile) and that I refused to spend 1$ when these wealthy ladys could and should be happy to pay for all costs.... I was assured that their IT crew were working on a "LADY PAY" feature as a priority..... we'll see eh??? If this does happen then...... Keep up with your good efforts others def need to know how to identify fakes and the real.... Regards RobertUpdate: A second reader's advice
This section was added on 5 March 2016. A second reader has written in to add that whilst Robert's advice to ask for photo ID recommends good practice, you should be wary of forged ID, and should perform other due diligence such as asking for further identification, chatting on web cam, and checking social media accounts to verify identity. He adds though that some dedicated scammers, by going to extraordinary lengths, can dupe even the most careful member. These are scammers who are willing to spend months working on their victims in order to get money out of them.
Translation or censorship? The asiandate.com lock-in
Every letter received in one's asiandate.com inbox is tagged with the identification number of a "translator". Consider this though: even women who list their English proficiency as "Advanced" in their profiles still have their letters subjected to "translation". Consider, too, that if you attempt to swap contact details by which to communicate privately and off-site, to avoid asiandate.com fees, those details are (or at least, so say your supposed correspondents) blanked out of your letter. This happened to my friend after he accepted my conclusion that the site was a scam, and tested the theory by asking one of his correspondents to respond to him off-site via email or Skype, providing her with his email address and Skype username: she replied that "they" erase those details. So, was his letter being translated or was it being censored?
Note that you agree to this (although it actually says nothing about Skype or other instant messengers) in the terms and conditions, under 5.f.: "You may not include in Your Member profile any telephone numbers, street addresses, last names, URLs or email addresses. You may not include in Your correspondence with other members any URLs, email addresses or telephone and fax numbers".
Getting back to the subject of translators: even if the translator is generally a separate person to your correspondent (which seems doubtful), what sort of privacy is it to have your letters read and "translated" even when you and your correspondent have no need of translation services?
Also, on the subjects of terms and conditions and lack of privacy, be aware that under 5.h., if you join asiandate.com you are agreeing to the following: "To ensure the quality of the Service provided, Your phone call, video date, or live chat through the Website may be recorded".
On www.scamorg.com, this scathing negative review, whose veracity, as with the previous review to which I linked, I cannot confirm, but which again is at least consistent with my more limited experience, indicates that it is possible to purchase the contact details of a woman on asiandate.com, but that once the reviewer did that, "the women immediately lost interest, and were never to be heard from again".
Fake positive reviews
There are negative reviews of this site, identifying it as a scam, littered across the web - I've linked to two already, and reference many more at the bottom of this page. There are also, however, plenty of positive reviews... or at least, so it might seem at first glance. Look closer, though, and it becomes apparent that these are highly likely to be fraudulent reviews. There are many examples of these on the asiandate.com review page of www.sitejabber.com. How did I infer that they are fraudulent? By investigating with Google Images the original sources of the profile pictures of the reviewers, both positive and negative - at least where those profile pictures existed; not all reviewers included them - and by comparing the review votes with the review votes of other websites. The following table lays out my findings, one review per row, starting with negative reviews with profile pictures, in order from earliest review to most recent, then moving on to positive reviews with profile pictures, again from earliest review to most recent.
Notice several things in this table:
- The profile pictures of each of the negative reviewers are generally associated only with the reviewer's www.sitejabber.com account, with the exception (it's unlikely, but given that I skipped a few, there might be other exceptions) of negative reviewer Ken C., who chose the Chicago Blackhawks logo as his avatar - a plausible choice assuming he is a committed fan of that team, which also is plausible. This is consistent with genuine reviewers who have uploaded original photos of their real selves. Conversely, very frequently the probable actual name of the person in the profile pictures of each of the positive reviewers does not match the name given in the review, and in those cases the image isn't consistent with having been chosen by a genuine reviewer: the people in the original images are not celebrities of the type that a guy might plausibly identify with and want to choose as an avatar; instead they are somewhat random guys from various random places on the web, and in some cases, gay. A gay guy/avatar reviewing a dating site for Asian women? Riiight. This is exactly what we'd expect with fraudulent reviews: a profile picture is desirable so as to lend credibility to the fake review, but the fraudulent reviewer is hardly going to use an original photograph of himself/herself, so s/he scours the web for, and appropriates, a photograph of a person whom not many people are likely to know, lending the review an air of legitimacy, and without the fake reviewer name raising suspicions (because readers are unlikely to know the real name of the person behind the profile picture). I have coloured these mismatched names in light red for your convenience.
- The earliest positive reviews have consistently and implausibly high vote counts: 44, 49, 46, 48, 44, 50, etc. Compare these vote counts with those of the reviews on the www.paypal.com review page and the www.google.com review page, also hosted by www.sitejabber.com. These are two web giants with vast userbases whose reviews would surely attract far higher vote counts than those of asiandate.com if no foul play was involved, yet what do we actually find? Of the 91 reviews of Google at time of writing, the vast majority had zero votes, and there was only one with more votes than nine - and the 50 votes of that review can readily be attributed to the fact that it revealed a relatively rare, unknown and valuable way to get help from Google staff. Of the 192 reviews of PayPal at time of writing, most of them had zero votes, and the highest vote for an individual review was 17. So, the reviews of the web behemoths Google and PayPal can barely get off the ground for votes, yet the early positive reviews (and only the early positive reviews - none of the negative reviews get many votes) for the much smaller and less generally known/useful site asiandate.com are consistently pulling in upwards of 40 votes each? If you're not willing to call "vote stuffing", then I have a bridge to sell you... [Update of 27 March 2015: a little over 8 months since writing the preceding, some of the Google and PayPal reviews now have significant numbers of votes - unfortunately, I did not freeze their pages to prove that the situation was as I described it at the time of writing. Nevertheless, this applies to only some of the reviews, and most of them still have far fewer votes than those early positive asiandate.com reviews.]
- Several of the positive reviewers seem keen to stress that asiandate.com is not a scam site, and that it has a reliable anti-scam policy. This reeks of damage control, especially given the scam-search-hijacking I'll describe next.
- Reading the positive reviews carefully, you might get a sense of careful crafting. There's high praise, but it's tempered with various acknowledgements, such as that the site is expensive - priming the mark for a financial pumping in which he eagerly participates (if you are scammed, it is your fault for not taking enough responsibility...). You might get the sense, as I do, that all bases have been a little too well covered.
Analysing profile picture sources for positive and negative reviews
The table below demonstrates that the profile pictures of supposedly genuine positive reviewers were in fact pilfered from random sites on the web, strongly suggesting, along with the other evidence above, that these positive reviews are fraudulent (the negative reviews have no such problem).
| Review | Google Images search results for profile picture | Probable original source of profile picture | Purported reviewer's name | Probable actual name of person in profile picture based on its probable origin | Notes | Review type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Google Images search results | Chicago Blackhawks (their logo) | Ken C. | n/a | It's plausible enough that a genuine reviewer of an Asian dating site is such a big fan of the Chicago Blackhawks as to choose their logo as his reviewer avatar. | Negative |
 | Google Images search results | The review itself | Jack W. | Jack W. | Negative | |
 | Google Images search results | The review itself | Chris H. | Chris H. | Negative | |
 | Google Images search results | The review itself, or, in general, the reviewer's account on www.sitejabber.com | JD L. | JD L. | Negative | |
 | Google Images search results | The review itself, or, in general, the reviewer's account on www.sitejabber.com | owen w. | owen w. | Negative | |
 | Google Images search results | The review itself | Gerry B. | Gerry B. | Negative | |
| [Skipping a few - it would be too tedious to include all of them, but the ones I've skipped are consistent with those I've included] | ||||||
 | Google Images search results | The Afternoon eye candy: Random hotties: Tattooed men! article or similar [Unfortunately, as of 2018-12-30, not even the archived version of this page exists any longer] | bill p. | ? | Is it really plausible that a genuine, virile, self-respecting, heterosexual reviewer of a dating site would choose some other, and random "hot", guy for his avatar? | Positive |
 | Google Images search results | The bossip.com news article Chicago Speeder Arrested For Driving 111 MPH To Have Sex or similar [Unfortunately, as at 2018-12-30, neither the live page nor any of its Wayback Machine archives any longer contain the image] | Iker V. | Zachary P. Ramirez | Positive | |
 | Google Images search results | The Kingston Times article Facial hair fanatics share their stories of personal growth or similar | Harry S. | Francis Sargenti | Positive | |
 | Google Images search results | The www.towleroad.com article, The Tao Of Uncle Poodle: Honey Boo Boo's Kinsman Speaks Out or similar | fabio k. | Lee Thompson | Note that, as described in the linked article, Lee Thompson is gay. What purpose would a gay man find in a site for dating Asian women, and why would any genuine user of such a site choose a gay man for his review avatar? | Positive |
 | Google Images search results | Eduard Leonardo's Twitter profile [When I checked on 2018-12-30, Eduard had changed his Twitter avatar. An image from which this one appears to have been cropped, though, can be found in the ENews article, Eddie & Riaan of Overtone and Mrs. Eastwood & Company on Cover of Frontiers Magazine, which also still predates this sitejabber review (by about two years)] | Jaanika K. | Eduard Leonardo, singer, actor and reality TV star | Note that, as with Lee Thompson above, Eduard Leonardo is gay - the same questions apply as to Lee. | Positive |
| [Skipped one ("Jay M.") here accidentally - I originally researched it but for some reason it didn't appear on one of my later page loads, so I assumed it had been deleted] | ||||||
 | Google Images search results | Profile picture of forum user "vintagekitchen" on the forums of www.vacuumland.org and www.automaticwasher.org, as seen in this thread [Unfortunately, as at 2018-12-30, neither the live thread nor any of its Wayback Machine archives any longer contain the image] | James C. | "vintagekitchen" | Positive | |
| [Skipping a few - it would be too tedious to include all of them, but the ones I've skipped are consistent with those I've included] | ||||||
 | Google Images search results | The entry for Senior Scientist Richard A Schwartz in the NASA phonebook | Lorant P. | Richard A Schwartz, Senior Scientist at NASA | Positive | |
| [Skipping a few - it would be too tedious to include all of them, but the ones I've skipped are consistent with those I've included] | ||||||
 | Google Images search results | University of Leeds, Faculty of Arts: Spanish, Portuguese and Latin American Studies Newsletter 2013 [Unfortunately, as at 2018-12-30, the page no longer exists and none of its Wayback Machine archives contains the image] | James J. | David Proctor, Alumni of the University of Leeds Faculty of Arts | Positive | |
| [Skipping a few - it would be too tedious to include all of them, but the ones I've skipped are consistent with those I've included] | ||||||
 | Google Images search results | The homepage of Professor Guy Blelloch of the Carnegie Mellon Computer Science Department | Jan L. | Professor Guy Blelloch of the Carnegie Mellon Computer Science Department | Positive | |
 | Google Images search results | The LinkedIn profile of Guy Farmer [When I checked on 2018-12-30, Guy had changed his LinkedIn avatar, but his Amazon author profile page still uses the same image] | George B. | Guy Farmer, The Self-Awareness Guy | Positive | |
 | Google Images search results | The businessinsider.com.au article How This Guy Sold His Two-Year-Old Company To eBay For $75 Million or any of a number of other sources | blain a. | Jack Abraham, successful internet start-up entrepreneur | In a possibly over-cautious move, I actually looked Jack up on Facebook, and contacted him by private message: he confirmed that he was unaware of this use of his image. I didn't go this far with any of the other image bearers above. | Positive |
| [Skipping a few - it would be too tedious to include all of them, but the ones I've skipped are consistent with those I've included] | ||||||
For proof that I have not manufactured or edited these images, in case the agents of asiandate.com delete or edit these reviews in the future, I have captured, using an independent service (FreezePage), freezes of the two review pages as they existed a few days after compiling the above (client-side scripting was disabled for the freezes, which is why all of the reviews in the pages below appear expanded whereas in the partial screen captures above some of them are truncated with a "read more" link):
If asiandate.com is a legitimate site rather than a scam, then why is it faking multitudes of positive reviews?
Scam search hijacking
[Update 21 October 2014: I have now frozen these pages so as to be able to offer links to them without improving their search ranking, as well as to prove their existence at time of writing]. Let's say you're operating a scam website, and you know that some of your marks are going to get suspicious and google your site plus the word "scam". You might want to put in place some measures to limit the damage, mightn't you? It's not surprising, then, that when you google "asiandate.com scam", two of the results that show up (admittedly not very close to the top - tsk tsk, asiandate.com, where are your SEO engineers?) are http://asiandatecomscam1.blogspot.com.au/ and http://asiandatecomscamornot.blogspot.com.au/, two essentially identical "blogs" which hijack the search word "scam" and turn it around, asserting a "100% scam free garantee! [sic]", along with offering various questionable testimonials. It is implausible that anyone other than an agent of asiandate.com itself would have set these sites up. The name of the supposed author of the blog posts, Sevalold Nestereksen, is linked to a Google+ account going by the same name, consisting almost entirely of multiple repeated posts asserting the same "100% scam free garantee!" for asiandate.com, as well as pimping anastasiadate.com and other sites that no doubt we would all do well to avoid: https://plus.google.com/108062454895904424542/posts (freezepage.com wouldn't let me freeze the page through https, so I reverted to http, but I doubt that changes anything).
Now ask yourself: if asiandate.com really is scam-free, then why does it have to go to such lengths to protest as much? Are these the actions of a reputable site?
Spam link attacks targeting this and other critical pages
Today - 20 October 2014, some three and a half months after this review was first published - I discovered that various sites and pages have been set up linking to this page, and to other pages critical of asiandate.com, with words associated with spam (Viagra and porn), a technique for encouraging Google and other search engines to downgrade the ranking of the target pages (due to the taint of spam). I have no hard evidence as to who the culprit is, but it doesn't take much (or even any) imagination to work out who has most to gain from such a tactic.
As usual, I will not link to these pages, however, I have again taken snapshots of a few of them via FreezePage as proof that they existed around the time of writing, and those snapshots are linked to in the below list. Bear in mind that these are only a few examples - there are many more: in total, according to my Google Webmaster Tools account at time of writing, 27 sites are involved in the spam link attack on this page itself. Most of those sites link to it only once, and none of them more than six times, except for the datepraguewomen.com site, which contains a total of 844 links, all of them bar one in a page which currently refuses to load in my browser - the frozen page linked to below contains the remaining link. Most of these sites are unwilling participants - e.g. blogs, forums and social networks where such spam can be posted anonymously.
The campaign seems to have begun about a month ago. Thankfully, any effect it might have had has not prevented the average search ranking of this page from improving in that time.
- http://e-book.e-crafting.eu/index.php?p=blogs/viewstory/54228: notice that a RipoffReport report on asiandate.com is linked to as "viagra", one of John Abbot's articles is linked to as "get free viagra", and the page you are currently reading is linked to as "viagra".
- http://datepraguewomen.com/: this site is set up to look like a WordPress blog. Its domain is registered anonymously through a privacy service. The same three pages as previously, plus another, a ScamVictimsUnited thread, are linked to many times with various spam-related keywords, including "Porn", "Teen Pornography", "young porn" and "free porn".
- http://www.meiyingenglish.com/classblog/members/tubadry3/activity/22612: here, the same three pages as in the first attempt are linked to with the various spam-related keywords "viagra" and "get free viagra".
It's a grubby tactic.
The upside of it is the information it provides: we now know which articles about this scam organisation "somebody" considers to be most damaging. Because of this, these articles are the first three entries in the "Other informative references" section below.
Other sites in the family, and questionable name changes
asiandate.com is part of a family of sites, all essentially identical other than in the race/nationality of the women they market. If you have been convinced by the preceding that asiandate.com is a scam, then you would do well to also avoid anastasiadate.com, amolatina.com and africabeauties.com.
As indicated in the introduction, other domain names alias to asiandate.com, and two in particular were once the primary domain names under which the site operated: asianbeauties.com and orientbrides.com. It appears that the site changes names when the weight of negative reviews and complaints on the web associated with its current name becomes too great for it to bear.
In general, be very careful in the online dating world, because these are not the only scam sites out there. An invaluable resource for learning and sharing information about the scam Asian dating sites in particular is the DragonLadies.org BBS [unfortunately, this forum seems now to be defunct].
Other informative references
The following are potentially helpful links that I encountered in my research of asiandate.com. As with all external links, I cannot vouch for the authenticity of any of them, but I trust the reader to form his/her own judgement.
- Speaking Of Scams, How About AsianBeauties.com and A Scam is a Scam is a Scam! Part 1: AsianDate.com, AsianBeauties.com by John Abbot, proprietor of a competing Asian dating website, ChinaLoveMatch.net. Despite the potential conflict of interest, and having researched a little into John and his site, I actually think he, his site, and these blogs are authentic. Targeted by the spam link attack campaign described above.
- The ScamVictimsUnited thread, Anastasia Dating Is Scam, reveals a lot of damning information about this organised scam, and you can also see in it the obvious attempts at damage control by its stooges, some acting openly in an official capacity, and some posing as satisfied customers. Targeted by the spam link attack campaign described above.
- A Ripoff Report review, AsianDate.com No free lunch, getting ones computer attacked internet. Targeted by the spam link attack campaign described above.
- A DatingBusters review, Is AsianDate.com / AsianBeauties.com Legit Or Just A Scam To Make Money From You?. Targeted by the spam link attack campaign described above.
- AsianDate.com Reviews on reviewopedia [web.archive.org copy]. There are several likely fraudulent positive reviews here, but a couple of negative ones too, much more likely to be genuine.
- A terse scam report on scamadviser.com
- Agency Review: Anastasiadate.com on the Western Women Suck blog [web.archive.org copy]. This is the review that inspired me to try my own experiment with a fake profile. [Clarification: unlike that reviewer, I am not of the opinion that Western women suck]
- AsianDate.com on scambook.com. One of the reviews here I linked to above.
- AsianBeauties.com on scambook.com
- anastasiadatefraud.com, one of the focuses of a legal action which AnastasiaDate brought and lost.
- The AnastasiaDate Wikipedia article
- An AsianBeauties.com thread on DragonLadies.org BBS [dead link, and page not archived on archive.org/web, apologies]. Are the purported emails in this thread genuine, and do they shed accurate light on the commercial nature of the dating agency relationships of asiandate.com/asianbeauties.com? Judge for yourself.
- Reviews of asianbeauties.com on www.sitejabber.com
- AsianBeauties.com Complaints & Reviews on Complaints Board
- AsianBeauties.com on Ripoff Report
- AsianBeauties on pissedconsumer.com
- Anastasia International, Inc. on the Better Business Bureau [web.archive.org copy]
- Asianbeauties.com is a SCAM. A single-page rant against the site, apparently by a former customer who got taken for a ride.
- Asian Beauties Review on Free Dating Helper. The review itself is a puff piece, but there are plenty of critical commenters.
Changelog (most recent first)
- 30 December 2018
- Blurred the faces of all AsianDate ladies in all images which feature them.
- Retitled the section now titled 'The "questionable" letters'.
- Added the section 'Non-consensual profile editing: the "out" that's still "in"?'.
- Updated the "Fake positive reviews" table to account for pages - intended to prove the prior existence of a reviewer avatar and the real identity behind the avatar - which no longer exist or which no longer contain the image. On mobile or narrow devices, missing links are simply struck through; on desktop or wider devices, an explanation is provided.
- 3 March 2018
- Updated a few links.
- Removed a row from the review table ("Thierry K.") because evidence of the preexistence of the photograph on the web has disappeared, and I can't find an archived copy of it.
- 21 November 2016
- Moved this changelog to the bottom of the page, and restyled it.
- Added a note at the top of page that the review pertains to asiadate.com aka asiandate.com, and not to asiandating.com.
- 5 March 2016
- 18 December 2015
- Added a section, A reader's feedback and advice after the section, "Agency women?", which includes that reader's finding that some of the women on asiandate.com are genuine, as well as his advice to other members of the site.
- 22 September 2015
- Added a new section, "Corroboration" based in part on a reader's feedback and in part on the discovery of an article about another dating site's automated scam-spam.
- 21 October 2014
- This review has provoked a reaction: "somebody" is targeting it - and other articles critical of asiandate.com and the Anastasia family - in a spam link attack campaign.
Comments